16h42 Because Ms. Mai Phuong did not come, the jury announced a break to continue the trial tomorrow morning.
16:15 the trial took a break When Ms. Nguyen Mai Phuong is present, the trial will continue.
16:00 Lawyer Nguyen Van Quynh defends defendant Phuong Nga provided the jury with some new evidence of the case. This lawyer requested the jury not to disclose this evidence due to some sensitive issues related to witnesses.
Next is the defendant. Dung admitted that he wrote a letter from the prison to Mr. Lu Minh Nghia. This letter was written by defendant Dung on a plastic bag and pen, and was made by the defendant himself when completing the letter that defendant Dung asked investigator Nguyen Van. Nghia forwarded it to Mr. Lu Minh Nghia and Ms. Nguyen Mai Phuong.
In that letter, defendant Dung wrote that he was very worried and confused, not knowing if he should listen to Ms. Mai Phuong or tell the truth in the story. The defendant’s letter all mentioned the romantic relationship between Mr. My and Phuong Nga. When he received the letter, Mr. Lu Minh Nghia wrote a letter back to defendant Dung. In that letter, Mr. Nghia told defendant Dung to rest assured that Nghia and Ms. Mai Phuong were outside to take care of him.
The jury questioned witness Lu Minh Nghia. Mr. Nghia admitted that after receiving a letter from defendant Dung, Mr. Nghia went to find Ms. Nguyen Mai Phuong and gave her this letter to read. Ms. Mai Phuong warned Nghia not to talk about this to anyone and to keep these evidences carefully. In the letter Mr. Nghia sent to defendant Dung, he advised Dung not to reveal the relationship between Phuong Nga and Mr. My because Mr. My’s power was so great that it would cause difficulties for Phuong Nga and Dung.
15:35 According to Mr. My, Mr. Ha is competing to buy the house at 7 Nguyen Trai. Of the total 165 billion VND Mr. My transferred to Phuong Nga, the first was cash with an amount of more than 2 billion VND. As for the additional transfer of 10 million VND that Mr. My transferred to Phuong Nga, Mr. My affirmed that this amount was very small, he asked Phuong Nga to buy essential daily items and Mr. My did not ask Phuong Nga to pay in this case.< /p>
In the second denunciation filed in August 2014, Mr. My submitted a statement of evidence proving that Phuong Nga fraudulently appropriated property. According to Mr. My, he submitted the money delivery note to the police for investigation as soon as he filed the second denunciation.
By the time Mr. My submitted the money delivery note, Mr. My had already transferred the money to Phuong Nga. 65 billion VND to buy the first house in District 5. When buying this house, Phuong Nga did not show Mr. My any documents related to the case. It wasn’t until she bought the house at 7 Nguyen Trai that Phuong Nga gave Mr. My a photocopy of the pink book.
According to Mr. My, Phuong Nga and I are very close friends who often go on business trips together. When we go out to eat, drink, talk and help each other financially when Phuong Nga is in trouble, Mr. My is willing to help Russia with amounts ranging from a few hundred million to billions and vice versa, he also often thanks Russia. buy things for me.
During the process of knowing Mr. My, I never once invited Phuong Nga to invest in stocks. When there is a need to exchange work, Mr. My and Phuong Nga often meet at coffee shops, but do not fix any shop. According to Mr. My, Phuong Nga has two older boyfriends. During the times Phuong Nga left the country with him, one of these two people was always present. Once again, Mr. My confirmed that he and Phuong Nga had left the country together 9 times in 2 years. In all the above 9 times, he has never been to Russia.
14:50 Lattorney Pham Cong Hung defended the defendant. The Russian defendant asked Mr. My, Mr. My admitted that on October 5, 2013, Mr. My signed a receipt from Phuong Nga for the amount of 6.5 billion VND.
According to Mr. My, I transferred a total amount of 16,5 billion VND to Phuong Nga. Besides the two agreements in the file, he has not seen any other agreements. Through the agreement, he is responsible for transferring money to Ms. Nga.
Witness Lu Minh Nghia said that because he was worried about defendant Dung’s psychological imbalance, he colluded with Mr. My to falsify his testimony
Next, lawyer Quynh, defending defendant Nga, asked witness Lu Minh Nghia. Mr. Nghia declared that in early 2010 he lived with defendant Dung. Also during this time, Mr. Nghia got to know Phuong Nga and often went out to eat together. In early 2010, Nga was renting a house and often visited Mr. Nghia’s house. One time, Mr. Nghia went to Nga’s house to visit and met a maid named Linh. If he met Ms. Linh now, he would definitely recognize her.
Mr. Nghia said he had met Ms. Nguyen Mai Phuong twice, Mr. Nghia did not remember her phone number. but it was saved in his phone. According to Mr. Nghia, when Nga and Dung were arrested, he called Ms. Nguyen Mai Phuong to make an appointment to ask why Nga and Dung were arrested.
According to him, Ms. Nghia Mai Phuong was afraid that the investigation agency would find out, so both Mr. Nghia and Mr. My limited their phone use and used other software instead. Every time he contacted Mr. My, he only asked where Dung’s money was. The first time Nga and Dung were arrested, Mr. Nghia was at the investigation agency and confessed until 6:00 p.m. and the next day he reported that a total of Mr. Nghia had gone to the police 10 times. Later, Mr. Nghia knew that Dung was mentally unbalanced, so he colluded with Mr. My to falsify his testimony.
According to Mr. Nghia, the content of the letter that Dung sent from prison was no longer available to him. Remember, however, that you still keep this letter and will return it to the jury tomorrow morning. When he received the letter Dung sent, Mr. Nghia sent it to Ms. Nguyen Mai Phuong. He did not send it to anyone other than this person. After receiving the letter, Mr. Nghia went to meet Mr. My. Afterwards, defendant Dung also confirmed that he had sent the letter out by hand through the investigation officer.
Mr. Nghia said the content He doesn’t remember the letter Dung sent from prison, but he still keeps this letter and will return it to the jury tomorrow morning. When he received the letter Dung sent, Mr. Nghia sent it to Ms. Nguyen Mai Phuong. Besides this person, he did not send it to anyone. After receiving the letter, Mr. Nghia went to meet Mr. My. Afterwards, defendant Dung also confirmed that he had sent a handwritten letter to the outside party through the investigation officer.
Witness claims she was slandered!
14:20 the trial begins. At the beginning, the lawyer defending the Russian defendant questioned Mr. Cao Toan My. According to Mr. My, the money delivery was done many times in many places so it is impossible to remember specifically. But every time she receives money, Phuong Nga always writes a receipt by hand and these receipts are currently kept by Mr. My.
The lawyer continues to question witness Lu Minh Nghia. Mr. Nghia confessed that he knew Phuong Nga through defendant Dung. While Nga was sick, Dung and Mr. Nghia came to take care of her. One time Mr. Nghia met Mr. My, he also came to take care of Russia. After that, the lawyer gave witness Nghia the will, and Mr. Nghia confirmed that this will was written by him.
According to Mr. Nghia, the time he made the will was September 2012. When he arrived at the Investigative Police Department, Mr. Nghia declared that he had withdrawn 500 from Dung’s account. According to Mr. Nghia, when he went to meet Ms. Nguyen Mai Phuong, this woman told her not to reveal the relationship between Russia and the United States. Previously, Mr. Nghia knew that Mr. My gave Russia a large amount of money for personal use.
Mr. Nghia affirmed that his initial statement was not true because Mr. Nghia was worried about his health. accused Dung as well as Mr. My of asking him to declare so so that Dung could be released on bail for investigation.
Mr. Nghia said he gave Phuong Nga 80 million to hire someone to threaten Mr. My. But Mr. Nghia did not know who Russia hired after that and what he did to Mr. America. According to Mr. Nghia, he clearly knew that Mr. My accused him of spreading the love contract, but Mr. Nghia affirmed that he did not spread this gmail and said that Mr. My was slandering him.
14:00 Defendant Phuong Nga was brought to court. During the trial this morning, the Russian defendant determined that the gmail spread on social networks was indeed the contract Mr. My sent to the defendant. The defendant affirmed that it was during the time he was detained, so he was not the one who distributed this gmail. This contract was sent from Mr. My’s gmail. However, Mr. My used too many gmails, so defendant Nga did not remember specifically which gmail he used.
When Mr. My accused the defendant, followed Ms. Nguyen Mai Phuong and deleted all emotional messages with Mr. My. According to the Russian defendant, I went abroad a lot with Mr. American. All of these trips were paid for by Mr. My. According to the Russian defendant, on all trips abroad, the two of them stayed in the same room, but when traveling within the country, they stayed in different rooms.
While witness Lu Minh Nghia confirmed his testimony at investigation agency is incorrect. “Because before I went to the police, Mr. Cao Toan My met Mr. Nghia to influence Mr. Nghia to give an untrue report,” said witness Lu Minh Nghia.
When Mr. Nghia went to the police station During the investigation, there was a strange phone number claiming to be Phuong Nga’s boyfriend, threatening to threaten Mr. Nghia 3 to 4 times, forcing Mr. Nghia to declare at this man’s request. When Mr. Nghia told this story to Cao Toan My, Mr. My told Mr. Nghia to go to the police and report the incident. However, after that, two men came to Mr. Nghia’s family to pressure Mr. Nghia to report the incident in a way unfavorable to Mr. My.
Currently, Truong Ho Phuong Nga’s lawyer is considering asked Mr. Cao Toan My about the relationship between him and Phuong Nga.
Mr. Cao Toan My said that he thought Phuong Nga had wide relationship with public agencies because Phuong Nga told him that Nga had a relationship with Ho Chi Minh City Police and the Ministry of Public Security.
In addition, Mr. My also said that he knew the family. Nguyen Duc Thuy Dung also has a “big” acquaintance.
In response to Phuong Nga’s lawyer, Mr. Cao Toan My said that when he filed the second denunciation, he had enough evidence about Phuong Nga’s fraudulent appropriation of property.
According to Mr. My, he sued Phuong Nga to get the money back, not to put Phuong Nga in prison. Because Phuong Nga has a very close acquaintance with the investigation agency of the Ministry of Public Security, Mr. My did not dare to provide documents proving Russia’s fraud because he was worried that the police would destroy this evidence.
Xuan Duy – Trung Kien
“
