As Dan Tri reported, on the afternoon of November 29, Doan Phuc An (2 years old, in Hoang Mai town, Nghe An) followed his brother to the garbage gate and then mysteriously disappeared. On December 2, the baby boy was found in a ditch about 3 meters deep, without water in the pine and acacia hills area of Quynh Xuan ward, Hoang Mai town).
Development area Currently, baby An has dense trees and has been searched before by his family and authorities but has not been found. At the time of discovery, An was not wearing pants, had light scratches on his arms and legs, and was conscious but crying and slightly panicked.
The authorities are continuing to verify and clarify the case.
Information about the incident attracts great attention from readers. Many people expressed doubts and pointed out suspicious points in the above incident.
Comment under Dan tridoc’s article Author Viet Anh questioned: “A 2-year-old child went missing for more than 2 days and was later found in a deep hole in the forest near his house. In the dark, deserted forest, the child’s ability to survive is very low.
However, when found and given a preliminary examination, the child’s physical condition was assessed as normal. Therefore, it is necessary to scientifically analyze whether or not the child was kidnapped, then due to the intense search, the kidnapper was forced to release the child.”
Similar line of thinking topic Vnevono article wrote: “How can a 2-year-old child go missing for 3 days without eating or drinking, and it’s raining and cold? How can he be normal and healthy? Not to mention the discovery was only 100 meters from the house while a sniffer dog searched.
“It’s too mysterious, so the police should investigate and clarify. Perhaps someone kidnapped the child, but before they could take him away, the family reported it to the police. Then, fearing exposure, they tried to release the child. It is necessary to quickly verify and find the perpetrator to avoid future consequences” reader Le Huu Long hypothesizes.
Follow current information lawyer Quach Thanh Luc (Director Director of the Hanoi Bar Association’s Judiciary Law Firm (Hanoi Bar Association) sees from a social perspective that this is an incident that causes anxiety and confusion for people and can negatively affect local security and order It is necessary to speed up the process of verifying the incident, continue to collect and consolidate evidence documents as well as take testimonies of relevant individuals to quickly clarify the incident to avoid confusion, fear and false rumors that may appear causing harm. negatively impacting local security and order.
From a legal perspective, according to lawyer Luc, the available information is still very limited and not enough to evaluate whether or not there are signs of child kidnapping. In this case, the investigation agency will continue to carry out professional activities such as consolidating the testimony of An’s parents and related people; extracting camera data from suspicious areas; Look for suspicious traces around the area where the baby was discovered (shoe prints, fingerprints, hair samples…); clarify personal relationships that have conflicts with the family (if any) or localize subjects with suspicious bad identities in the locality…
From the data that needs to be collected, clarify this basis. Authorities will evaluate whether or not child kidnapping occurred in the case. In case there are no signs of child abduction, baby An is missing due to getting lost or other objective causes, the authorities will decide not to prosecute a criminal case.
On the contrary, in cases where many suspicious suspects are discovered, investigation needs to be expanded to clarify, the investigation agency will decide to prosecute a criminal case for the act of Appropriating a person under the age of 16 (Article 153) or Kidnapping to appropriate property. property (Article 169) in the 2015 Penal Code depends on the data collected during the verification process for investigation according to the provisions of law.
Hoang Dieu
“
