Mr. Pham Khanh Phuong – Member of the Board of Directors (BOD) of Song Da 1.01 Joint Stock Company (SJC) – has just reported to the management agency on the transaction results shares of insiders and related insiders.
For the first time, Mr. Khanh Phuong (known as singer Khanh Phuong, owner of the song “Warm Wind Scarf”) reported trading results after being Commission Securities The State (SSC) fined 245 million VND for “illegal” trading of SJC shares.
Accordingly, Mr. Phuong sold 901,520 shares (value calculated according to par value). more than 9 billion VND) thereby reducing the ownership ratio to 908,576 SJC shares, corresponding to the ownership ratio decreasing from 26 1% to 13 1%. The transaction was carried out through an agreement method during the June 16 trading session.
The number of shares held after the transaction by Mr. Pham Khanh Phuong and related persons respectively 1,93 million shares, equivalent to 27,79%.
In which Nam Nhat Khang Investment Joint Stock Company – businesses related to Mr. Phuong – holding more than 1 million million shares SJC respectively owns 14 69% of Song Da’s charter capital 1.01.
Notably, through Mr. Pham Khanh Phuong’s report, he also revealed information about this singer’s private life.< /p>
Accordingly, Mr. Phuong has a wife, Ms. Vu Thi Thuy, who is the Chairman of the Board of Directors and General Director of Song Da 1.01. Holding a key position, Ms. Thuy only owns a modest 22 SJC shares, equivalent to 0 0003% of the total number of voting shares. Thus, singer Khanh Phuong is no longer single as information has been spreading for a long time in the media and social networks.
Ms. Vu Thi Thuy is also the legal representative of Song Da 1.01. In a recent move, Ms. Thuy signed the company’s extraordinary information disclosure document confirming that the company’s annual general meeting of shareholders (GMS) on June 28 was not eligible to proceed according to regulations. decision.
The reason is not meeting the percentage of shareholders attending the meeting representing over 50% of the total votes. The total number of shareholders present and authorized others to attend and vote on their behalf at the meeting is only 4 shareholders who own and represent 10 56% of the total shares with voting rights.
Ms. Thuy said that due to lack of conditions to proceed, the company stopped the meeting. On the other hand, the company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors did not participate in the meeting, so he did not elect a chairman.
“The security and order situation at the meeting was not stable. The shareholder’s proxy recipient was intentional. caused disruption and hindered the work taking place at the congress” – Ms. Vu Thi Thuy stated in the report.
“
