The 4th day of trial of the Viet A grand jury trial is the impeachment and sentence recommendation of the Procuracy, followed immediately by the arguments and defense arguments of the defendants’ lawyers.
p>
After the Procuracy announced the impeachment, the jury asked the defendants three times if they had any opinions or defended themselves, but no one stood up on the podium to testify. Then, in turn, the lawyers defend their clients.
Comments of the Procuracy
In court, agency representatives The prosecutor emphasized that this case is typical of “interest group” interests and “systematic collusion and collusion”.
This collusion according to the Procuracy is between enterprise with a person in authority who, for material gain, has acted contrary to the provisions of law, creating conditions for businesses to profiteering, causing particularly serious damage to the State…; causing harm to a section of public officials The degenerate and corrupted authorities have reduced the people’s trust in the State Party.
According to the Procuracy in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic breaking out at a dangerously rapid rate of spread, causing heavy damage to people’s lives and health Vietnamese people The Government and the entire people are trying their best to cope, but a part of senior leaders in central ministries and localities have colluded with businesses to enjoy benefits and cause damage to the Vietnamese people. State property.
Specifically, the defendants helped Viet A coordinate to participate in the implementation of a national research project on Covid-19 testing. Then, using many tricks, the defendants committed a series of violations to turn state-owned research products into products owned by Viet A.
From then on, Viet A produced commercially. Illegally trading test kits across the country at inflated prices to make particularly large illegal profits.
Defendant Phan Quoc Viet
In the report Impeach the prosecutor’s office accusing the Chairman of Viet A Company of colluding with Mr. Trinh Thanh Hung (former Deputy Director of the Ministry of Science and Technology) so that Hung could influence Mr. Chu Ngoc Anh Pham Cong Tac (former Ministry of Science and Technology) Minister and former Deputy Minister of Science and Technology) decided to allow Viet A to cooperate in researching the topic.
With the purpose of semi-test production, Viet continued to collude with Mr. Hung and Mr. Nguyen Thanh Long (former Minister of Health) Nguyen Huynh (former Assistant to Mr. Long)… committed many violations.
To facilitate the sale of tests, Viet colluded with the defendants at the Ministry of Science and Technology. to polish brand image; colluding with the defendants at the Ministry of Health to negotiate at inflated prices…
To get his accomplices to intervene and help as above, Viet agreed to divide and pay bribes to thank him many times with a total of 3.45 million USD and 4 billion VND.
Especially in Vietnamese localities, subordinates at the company colluded with leaders and employees of public medical facilities to commit acts contrary to regulations on bidding. contractor.
Vietnamese test kit consumption process directs staff to calculate the percentage of payment outside the contract; Directly or directed to bribe a total of more than 34 billion VND.
The Procuracy assessed that Viet played a mastermind role in colluding with other defendants to organize a series of violations infringing on the activities of Correct actions of the organizing agency…
Therefore, Viet was recommended 15-16 years in prison for violating bidding regulations causing serious consequences; 15-16 years for Bribery. The total proposed penalty is 30 years in prison.
Defendant Nguyen Thanh Long
According to the Procuracy, Mr. Long in his position as Minister of Health is The head of the health sector during the outbreak of the disease, this defendant took advantage of his position and authority to intervene and direct individuals and agencies with the authority to help Viet A.
Impeachment believes that Viet A was helped by Mr. Long throughout the process of granting official temporary circulation registration numbers for testing; turning testing from a State-owned product to Viet A’s ownership; Negotiate the payment price for 200,000 tests according to the price falsely raised by Viet A; publicizing prices to create a price level for testing…
The prosecution agency accused the actions of Mr. Chu Ngoc Anh and Mr. Tac of causing a loss of 18,98 billion VND in the State budget. In addition, Mr. Chu Ngoc Anh and Mr. Tac were also “thanked” by Viet for 200,000 USD and 50,000 USD, respectively.
The indictment stated that both defendants sincerely confessed their repentant crimes. repent and actively cooperate with the investigation agency to clarify the nature of the family impact case and submit to overcome the consequences.
Mr. Chu Ngoc Anh was awarded many Certificates of Merit; was proposed by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Hanoi People’s Committee to reduce the penalty…
As for Mr. Tac, according to the Procuracy, this defendant confessed to the crime but only admitted to receiving 100 million VND from Viet. However, based on Viet Hung’s testimony… electronic data of Viet’s bank account statement, experimental investigation results and other evidence documents, the prosecution found there was enough basis to identify Mr. Vietnam received 50,000 USD.
Details of proposed sentence for 38 defendants
Crime of Violation of bidding regulations causing serious consequences and Bribery /strong>
Phan Quoc Viet (Chairman of the Board of Directors and General Director of Viet A Company): 15-16 years in prison for violating bidding regulations; 15-16 years in prison for bribery: Total 30 years in prison.
Vu Dinh Hiep (Deputy General Director of Viet A): 8-9 years in prison for violating bidding regulations; 8-9 years in prison for bribery: Total 16-18 years in prison.
Crime Receiving bribes
Nguyen Thanh Long (former Minister of Health): 19-20 years in prison.
Pham Duy Tuyen (former Director of CDC Hai Duong): 13-14 years in prison.
Trinh Thanh Hung (former Deputy Director of the Ministry of Science and Technology): 14-15 years in prison.
Nguyen Minh Tuan (former Director of the Ministry of Health): 8-9 years in prison.
Nguyen Huynh (former Deputy Head of Drug Price Management Department of the Drug Administration of the Ministry of Health): 9-10 years in prison.
Nguyen Nam Lien (former Director of Financial Planning of the Ministry of Health ): 8-9 years in prison.
Crime Bribing
Phan Ton Noel Thao (assistant Finance Viet A): 4-5 years in prison.
Ho Thi Thanh Thao (treasurer of Viet A): 4-5 years in prison.
Crime Violating regulations on management and use of State assets causing loss and waste
Chu Ngoc Anh (former Minister of Science and Technology): 3-4 years in prison.
Pham Cong Tac (former Deputy Minister of Science and Technology): 3-4 years in prison.
Crime Violation Bidding regulations cause serious consequences
Tran Thi Hong (employee of Viet A Company): 36-48 months in prison.
Tran Tien Luc (employee employee of Viet A Company): 36-42 months in prison.
Le Trung Nguyen (employee of Viet A Company): 36-42 months in prison.
Nguyen Thi Hau (former Deputy Department of Finance and Accounting CDC Bac Giang province): 36-42 months in prison.
Phan Huy Van (Director of Phan Anh Pharmaceutical Company): 42-48 months in prison.
Phan Thi Khanh Van (freelance business): 4-5 years in prison.
Lam Van Tuan (former CDC Director of Bac Giang province): 6-7 years in prison.
Nguyen Manh Cuong (former Chief Accountant of CDC, Hai Duong province): 30-36 months in prison.
Nguyen Thi Trang (former Director of the Center for Consulting and Financial Services, Department of Finance of Hai Duong Province ): 30-36 months suspended prison.
Tieu Quoc Cuong (former Chief Accountant, former Deputy Head of Financial Planning Department, Department of Health of Binh Duong Province): 4-5 years prison.
< p>Nguyen Thanh Danh (former Director of CDC, Binh Duong province): 10 months and 4 days (equal to temporary detention).
Tran Thanh Phong (former Deputy Head of Finance and Accounting Department of CDC, Binh Duong province) : 24-30 months in prison.
Le Thi Hong Xuyen (former CDC employee in Binh Duong province): 2-3 years in prison.
Nguyen Truong Giang (Company Director VNDAT): 3-4 years in prison.
Nguyen Thi Thuy (Project Director of VNDAT Company): 30-36 months in prison.
Nguyen Van Dinh (former Director of CDC Nghe An province): 30-36 months suspended prison.
Nguyen Thi Hong Tham (former CDC Chief Accountant Nghe An province): 24-30 months suspended prison.
Ho Cong Hieu (employee of Southern Appraisal Company, Nghe An branch): 24-36 months suspended prison sentence.
Vu Van Doanh (Director of Thang Long Appraisal Company): 30-36 months suspended prison.
Ta Ngoc Chuc (General Director of Global Appraisal and Investment Company): 24-30 months in prison.
Ninh Van Sinh (former Deputy Director of the Company) Trung Tin Valuation Company) 18-24 months in prison.
Crime Abusing position and power while performing official duties
Pham Manh Cuong (former Director of the Department of Health of Hai Duong province): 5-6 years in prison.
Nguyen Van Trinh (former Government Office official): 7-8 years in prison .
Pham Xuan Thang (former Secretary of Hai Duong Provincial Party Committee): 5-6 years in prison.
Crime Abusing influence over with people in positions of power for personal gain
Nguyen Bach Thuy Linh (Director of SNB Holdings Company): 30-46 months suspended prison.
Nguyen Thi Thanh Thuy (former Education Publishing House specialist): 3-4 years in prison.
“